Thursday, 1 August 2013

Rivers Assembly leader arraigned for attempted murder

Majority Leader of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Chidi Lloyd (third left) being led to the court in Port Harcourt...on Wednesday.


Majority Leader of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Chidi Lloyd (third left) being led to the court in Port Harcourt...on Wednesday.
AFTER eight days in police custody, the Majority Leader of the Rivers State House of Assembly,Chidi Lloyd, have finally appeared before a High Court in Port Harcourt.
Lloyd, arraigned on six counts of attempted murder, conspiracy, assault and malicious damage, arrived at the court about 10.52am accompanied by riot policemen and other security operatives.
Clad in blue attire, the lawmaker limped as he entered the court premises, supported by two unidentified persons.
The offence of the PDP lawmaker, who was reportedly involved in the fracas in the State Assembly on July 9, 2013, the prosecution said, was contrary to Section 320 of the Criminal Code Law, Cap 37 laws of Rivers State of Nigeria 1999.
 Lloyd allegedly hit his fellow lawmaker, Michael Chinda, with a fake mace during a fight at the Assembly chamber.
During the hearing, the prosecution counsel, Donald De-wigwe (SAN), objected to the state Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice,Worgu Boms’ plea to take over the criminal proceeding.
De-wigwe argued that Boms could not take over the court proceedings since there was no proper arraignment of the accused before the court.
De-wigwe said, “Judicially, the argument does not stand. It is not a law of today. The issue is that whether or not there is a criminal proceeding before the court. Until plea is taken, there is still nothing for the attorney-general to takeover.”
Referring to legal authorities to defend his argument, De-wigwe said the attorney-general’s attempt to take over the criminal proceeding of the court was premature.
Boms had earlier noted that Section 211 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, empowered him to take over the case.
Noting that the measure was necessary in the interest of justice, the Attorney-General insisted that the alleged offence was against the state.

No comments:

Post a Comment